putin likes to threaten.not believe his talk about the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons of nuclear weapons, i am not sure that such a concept as tactical nuclear weapons is correct, we simply have an immoral use of weapons. if he used nuclear weapons against estonia, latvia or poland, it would be completely cynical before the rapid change of public opinion in russia, which would be difficult for putin himself to survive, the biggest difficulty is in the fact that it is very difficult for us in the west to understand exactly what is going on in putin's head, because now he is the best-protected asset in the world, and the west is now required to continue to hold tightly to the pile in my opinion, we should all apply the same sanctions at the same time with the same effect. unfortunately, the behavior of certain countries such as hungary is simply shameful. i even came across americans who are convinced that putin is doing a good thing, of course we also have to fight against cybercrime, because from wo

this is how global putin was.aine was such a bridgehead, but in fact ukraine turned out to be a player. ukraine turned out to be a subject and not an object, as putin did not want it that's not how it happened that's why it happened, of course victory in this war is important for them from the point of view of staying in this big game, but if they fail, if it's already bad, then of course russia can choose another path, but the other path will obviously not be implemented immediately for the simple reason that in russia, in the kremlin itself, certain processes may take place that will leave no chance for putin to remain in power, this is another story, you know, when you look at what russia is doing and what the russian government is doing, throwing away huge amounts of money on propaganda, you get once again for yourself you come to an understanding of what the kremlin is really afraid of, you know when they say that if putin or the kremlin power is such a global power, you know such a castle by franz kafka, thi

well, it is clear, this is the same school from which putin came to power.e came to power by blowing up the houses of his own residents, and i blame it on the chechen resistance. blow up the zaporizhia as in order to prevent the offensive of the ukrainian army , which cannot be stopped by military means, and the proposer of the supply of modern american weapons andrey andreevich. the same goes for control over the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, but he gives the impression of a completely inadequate person, so he starts talking about some uh, barely non-slavic, some kind of atomic heritage, and there, take it away from the so-called in quotation marks, of course, from the nazis, yes, or turn everything into ashes, that is, i don’t know if this is a game for the public from consideration, hold me there, because otherwise i will kill my own to the grandmother, explain exactly the question to us as a leader, because for him this is a brilliant invention, how to arrange a nuclear catastrophe, he ran away, he ran away, why is she standing here, they questioned

such a symbol of this putin elite, which well, by simply removing him, putin risks that other, so toentatives of this putin's entourage is thinking about the fact that well, how is it all over, well, you must understand that this is their fault if you read , er, some facts oleksiy and i, i'm sorry, i'm going to interrupt, i still want to ask us one question literally in a minute of time, er, we're still about that i think we will talk someday, thank you very much for this comment and the statement of olga stefanichnych, you are the prime minister on european integration, that ukraine does not want membership in nato , but only membership in nato. thanks to mr. vitaly, well, actually speaking, they are often impossible without pdc i.e. no one on the procedure for acquiring membership, this can be said to be such a hyped statement, i do not see any institutional logic in this, since anyone deals with this topic, i understand that there is an exception even for ukraine. criteria yes, even according to the simplified procedure, even entering into a certain e-e understanding of ukraine as

, that is, we serve putin.l, everything is as it was today, and people served as they served, as they serve. that's all you need to know about the mentality of today's russia . sanctions, someone expected that western sanctions would work harder on russia, i expected that they would work, but for a certain time, mainly in the medium term, because in russia they turned on the handle, control over capital and, in particular, smuggling, strictly controlling flows of capital, it seems, formally, it balanced the macroeconomics, but in fact, we also understood what is happening, they are trying to pull different so-called parallel imports, but hmm, you can play with the economy, you can play with the military potential, what are they doing? but technologically, they will go to the 20th century well, what can they do, well, in fact, nothing, the future is technology and urban cities are running after russia, not all, but a large part of them are running, uh, technologies, but uh, putin said, let's develop our own well

rajap and ip erdoğan would offer zelensky to meet with putin after erdoğan also flew to putin in sochis some kind of conversation, the results of this conversation are not known for sure, but it is obvious, hmm, the president of turkey still does not give up hope of arranging a meeting between zelensky and putin either in ankara or in istanbul, can it happen ? this meeting and is this meeting necessary now with zelenskiy in the situation in which we are now, well, talk with putin and the russian regime, we need first together from the west and from a position of strength if we feel that we can talk like that and this will show the situation on areas of hostilities on the fronts, then it is one story if we will have the option of delaying, then it is another story if we see the readiness of the west to raise the stakes. this is the third story. therefore, now we should deal with uh-uh predicted because it depends on many factors uh-uh, it is not that this kind of thing is ungrateful. it's just not worth it from the point of view of emotions and what's happening with turkey. well, it's r

putin yes, let’s call it right now. appointed the chief of negotiations and the regeneration of ukraine the mission was carried out by dear macaroni and anna shultz arrived in kyiv on june 16. withdraw with this plan now if it is possible to reprimand him, he accepted it, as if he began to repeat , that is, macaroni, that it is not necessary to humiliate russia, it is not wrong to talk to russia, it is necessary to have this opportunity, or when it is smart, cynical political activity, following its national turkish interests, ottoman the situation in the ottoman empire, he perfectly understands that the ukrainians will not agree, but he will come later because he will say well, vladimir is like that, i asked about these ukrainians, he does not agree, but he already took took putin to a competent scene, this is karabakh, this is armenia, this is style, this is another time, this is what my main character is doing, this is what is happening now. nagorno-karabakh of his ally, oh, you need to do everything you want, everyt

and where is this about bringing putin to the point where he is not putin, putin’s regime is the statehat he is it cannot continue to exist in russia, i don’t know what will happen next. this is a different question from mr.’s question, but this is how i imagine this peace. the peacemakers are coming because when putin’s russia, the putin regime either collapses or remains as weak as possible. it can wage wars. and how much it is interesting that it takes time for this, it may take several years, we do not know this, it is possible that we will do it with you, we will be happy with you , first of all, we will be happy, what are we going to do before this, or first of all, this is what i put behind the essence of this bloodletting russia's bloodletting putin in ukraine plus plus plus plus international sanctions isolation we don't know if it will work but i don't know another strategy now i'm helping the west and in relation to russia well but this is a dangerous strategy for ukraine itself absolutely dangerous but war and dangerous we are becoming but you are very small. maybe you can

he said that he offered volodymyr zelensky to meet with putin in turkey, and putin himself seemed to hinted at erdogan's readiness for such a meeting in sochi, writes zahidna press by the way, this is not the only signal, the british edition of the daily mirror published a report by western special services, in which an unnamed kremlin official came out from the nearest putin entourage and offered to start negotiating. is it true that there is real panic in the kremlin? there is a bullet with experts. i tried to figure out the panic in the kremlin. the cat can communicate with the west behind putin's back and the fixed concept of survival and the fool will be killed as a hole in the russian budget accelerates the collapse of gdp politics, of course, news for russia. and why the kremlin wants negotiations with ukraine about the fact that the clouds over the kremlin are actively thickening, signaling more and more details, first there were data about a phenomenal hole in the russian budget, and later there was also a leak of information that allegedly someone is trying to negotiate beh

by the way , putin has a lot of nazi symbols. clothes, hats, etc.things mean on the collars of these, well, on the collar, it is very similar to the uniform of the nazis. by the way, you don’t even need to be an expert in historical sciences to understand it, but here it is also interesting what and they all mean russkie is an appeal to the fact that we you all know we have to share money somewhere and live like this, when the monks come to moscow they bend the russians and the russians come somewhere else they bend some people there i don't know whether mari is there or chuk or someone else those others that is, they are all somehow nationalities yes ethnic groups a when there is a war, they are all significant in beirut, and putin is here repeating what stalin repeated, who after the second world war just said that it was the russian people who had the greatest merit in the fact that they won this war. what exactly are the russian people the first people e in the union, there is no movement of people's and free republics, and putin is doing the sa

uh well enter directly have contact with putin so again this is diplomacy.ts. they sometimes go through third parties. they do not advertise themselves. they can go through cardigans. the main thing is that there should be no attempts to bargain. well, a return to having business from another side is the main thing. i think that in the west, after all, in general, the position of understanding of the ukrainian side is that putin does not have to win, but for me it is a question of how much to supply weapons to ukraine, and what is the phasing of the supply of weapons? that's why it's very important, even though we understand that even now in donbas, artillery radiation and missiles have the advantage, it's still putin's, another thing is that we can inflict very painful blows at the expense of hymers, and not only in donbas we see other regions as well, but all the same. we need more and more weapons, so what is this? well, i think everyone is working on this, ours and our diplomacy, too, you know, now certain news that we used to perceive normally, now they

well, it's one of the big debates with putin. i think that historians will be debating this for a long time. to come what has changed and maybe not that much. maybe he's just shown his true colors in the last couple of months. and what we saw before was a sort of hidden or moderate version of putin. i'm a little bit more inclined to say that putin himself seems to have changed and one way. that seems really significant to me is that he's much more of a risk taker at the moment, and i thought he was before obviously putin could be aggressive. it was a shrewd operator if you have any questions about putin's willingness to use brutal tax extend civilians. you need only go back to the syrian war of 2015 or to the wars and chechnya where much of what's happening in ukraine was was anticipated by the actions of the russian military. so that's not a boundary that he's crossed recently. he crossed that boundary long ago, but the kind of risk that he's taken with his own economy on the battlefields of ukraine. it's a war he could lose and

i don't know who putin is there.ng of the so-called father of the more active group, so that is security forces, how does the same shoigu fit in there, because the signal he sent is quite difficult, on the one hand, he demonstrates, i don't know , russia's military impotence, that is, they cannot offer anything new strategically, and that is why he talks about slowing down the war against ukraine, so to speak, and on the other hand we understand that it was shoigu who was responsible for various, so to speak, negotiating points, that is, the minister of defense who stands at the origins of the war. well, in quotation marks, of course, but you know the pacifist signal, i agree with you that the arcs are not usual well, what about the second time, then he is the same as nothing, that in the environment he has the same influence on putin as dolgin, that is, zero signals shoigu tashkent - this is putin's signal the last solid point he made in the conflict was a stroke by the fascists who wanted to impose on him the destr

what does putin need?needs, of course, to bypass western sanctions , that is, to sell gas for rubles, what exactly is it about ? what else does putin need, maybe that we don't know about or that we can guess by understanding, so to speak, the agenda, please? he wants also in order to create an image of ukraine as a country that does not want to negotiate, and you see, for this he uses all the possibilities that he actually does not have anymore eh, remember the last visit of this german eh so-called chancellor schröder eh, through which putin actually eh started this campaign of training western thought to the fact that ukraine should read at the negotiating table. and if it carries it, then it is to blame for the fact that the war continues, i think that it is roughly the same , only under a different sauce putin is trying to play with erdoğan, that's why i don't rule out that in the near future erdoğan will make some kind of statement, in which he will repeat to one degree or another what putin has been

this is the stupid behavior of putin. today, putin's behavior depends very much on the west.his is russian and ukrainians, i blame each other. by the way, this standard statute is such a meme that russian ukrainians accuse each other of being prisoners of polenovsky russian ukrainians, no, this is the most despicable media strategy, a political strategy that can only be used like this because this de facto equates the victim and the murderer, i just, well, sometimes i lose my cool when something like this happens. listen , from the other side, we see andrii andriyovych and how they are. i don't know why they commit such terrible crimes. it's about katyn in the deer park, ask which time which adheres to his etogo. how did you say that he'll be fine with it, or either horns, or ukrainians, well, 20 percent - this is a high -paying agency of the kremlin, for example, working for two 10 ladies is a nest of editors from 7 useful old idiots, which i don't think that salvan russian agent, he is a supporter of such a school , with a talogic real politician, a supporter of political a

that's particularly putin, his military and those who support putin.s. this is the crimes against humanity. and putin is a war criminal. within weeks, russia's invasion plans shifted dramatically. the lightning assault on the capital kyiv and on kharkiv failed. regime change didn't happen. instead, moscow settled on attrition, the application of overwhelming firepower to destroy towns and cities and break the will to resist. plan a failed. plan b ensured a long, bloody war. it would be naive from the west to expect that this operation could end in a week. i've heard speculation about it, and some people would say, "well, it should end quickly." i don't think so, because russian forces are very careful, so they don't hurt the civilian population. if they wanted to finish it very quickly, look, they could just, you know, smash the whole territory. but we don't do it. we do as careful as possible so the civilians don't suffer. we understand very clearly that vladimir putin expected ukrainian resistance to be minimal. he expected resistance to crumble and

we can agree with something, but they are against putin, and now anyone who is against putin is our allyand by the way, geminto has already said about the headquarters of mr. navalny, the headquarters of mr. kasparov is also located in vilnius, which is 100% an ally of ukraine and always supported him and his territorial integrity and was on our side all the time so i think that now it is necessary to look at whether the people are ready to fight putin or not, and this was the main sign here, the question is whether they are ready to fight putin for their power or whether they are ready to fight putin for ukraine well, it seems to me that this is the difference between mr. we all have one enemy , that's putin, and we need to unite all the nations against him, too, russia. yes, that's what a colleague said very well. and not only russians come together with the kasparovs, we also do big events for these people who are fighting for freedom from all over the world in lithuania, but we want to convince them to fight against putin today , because putin can also the brains of very many nations

do you support putin's positions there?picked up the nobel peace prize in 1991, you said, "you know what? i am always an optimist." i wonder if there is much room for optimism today. when you see the crisis in relations between the western powers and vladimir putin, when you see conflict, again, on the eastern borders of europe involving russia, can you be an optimist today? the world could be on the brink of another conflict today. mikhail gorbachev, we have to end there, but i thank you very much indeed for being on hardtalk. spasibo. ochen spasibo. hello. as we turn the weather page from summer to autumn, it looks like nature is taking its cue as well. big changes this weekend — there could be a bit of thundery rain around across much of the uk. not everyone will see it and potentialfor some strong winds, as well. the weather charts really scream autumn. area of low pressure which will develop around that, bands of heavy and thundery rain, and potentially little smaller areas of low pressure within it, which could bring

why is putin so attached to ukraine?tand that he believes that there is no ukrainian people and so on and so on and so on he is now a huge loss of loss but there may be even greater losses of what he really wants or is he just a sick person and it is difficult to somehow read his logic well i am not a doctor i i can’t give diagnoses and without a doctor’s diploma , it will be charlatanism with us and there are so many willing to give out, you know, assessments that do not bear any responsibility for this, but as a historian, based on my education, i will say that only with ukraine, muscovy or the russian empire or the russian federation can be a powerful world power player. that's the whole secret and the whole very simple answer, that is, until, er, if we look at almost 31 years of ukrainian independence, until the ukrainian leadership of various years did not try to get out of the russian influence, everything was fine, as soon as such efforts began, everything immediately became the personality of the ukrainian presid

in putin's view. obviously, as you just said, the ukrainians not -- to the ocean flag, logistically lack of air supremacy. just from a tactical strategic standpoint, this professional army, i think it surprised a lot of people how poorly it has performed. >> of course, there are two ways of looking at the same issue here. on the one hand, ukrainians have performed way above expectations that many of the u.s. and ukraine and russia had for the ukrainian military. part of it is the success of the ukrainian military. they've had moral. they have really been training and improving their military since 2014. they have the assistance of quite a few very vulnerable countries. including the united states. that's clearly a major factor. beyond an unreliable concept that either putin or his generals developed for this war, we see lots of corruption within the russian military. you just see a sense of confusion on the part of russian soldiers as to what it is they are fighting for. that is a recipe for not succe

from a fragment of various putin by macron, and maybe putin didn’t even know, well, for sure, he didn that it would be in the cinema. but nevertheless, it happened and again, so to speak, and from these enzymes it was clear that we deceive putin absolutely directly and brazenly, that is, to call again the person who repeatedly deceived you means to want to be deceived again well, i would not say that this is a reasonable position, well, by the way, i am journalists, league-g galash who made this film, the president of europe and the war. he noticed everything very subtly. he described these moments in a very cool way. well, the fact that putin turned out to be just a cynical liar in the end, well, it’s obvious, but there is a plus here, because putin allegedly promised to allow the mission of the zaporizhia atomic store power plant but you and i just spoke and you yourself said that you believe that putin should not tell, so now we will discuss other topics because the promises of the road - that's it, it will either happen or happen partially or not at all, we'll see here, it's very

do you agree with this opinion and what do you think will happen to putin, that putin will declare his victory with the obvious skidding of their troops in the donbas and also in the east of ukraine? i hope that putin will no longer have a chance to declare victory, that is, this situation that we now have it will turn into a conflict between the elites and in the end i hope that sooner rather than later putin will still find a snuffbox for him, but if we talk about this theory that putin wants to show that he is not ineffective well, of course, putin in general openly and constantly declared that too much is incapable of anything, that europeans in general are weak people that we are twisted by him and he would really buy a lot , in fact he bought and recruited several european leaders - it is no secret that this is known and so on, that's why i, for example i think that his the biggest victory he won over nato was the bucharest summit in april 2008, when he personally arrived in bucharest and personally pressed the leaders of france, merkel and sarkozy, and forced them to block the p

claim is this the war of putin and the majority of russians, and putin and the russians? he is a very good question to which there is no simple answer . ataman petlyura tried to keep independent ukraine in the union with poland, he said that in russia even anarchists are imperialists, there is something in that russian culture is deeply imperial here, reread dostoyevsky or most of russian literature, which is outstanding but still imperial, and it seems that most russians, for the sake of holy peace, agree with the imperial propaganda that pours forth from all state and private media, but even according to official russian statistics, a large part of russians against the war seems to be no more than half and half in russia now there are more political prisoners than in the ussr during the time of brezhnev, not only navalny but also kara murza and several thousand brave russians who are resisting putin, i heard president zelensky's proposal to refuse visas for russians and i take it very seriously, maybe it will come to that but as a transitional option it would be possibl

putin was unknown outside of russia. he had been a kgb officer, i think most of us know, and east germany. he came back for a while, worked as a taxi driver, said he worked as a taxi driver. and then got into saint petersburg mayoral politics. was given the job of head of the fsb, at the intelligence services in the late 1990s. certainly is a very capable manager. a ph. d. in law. has self discipline and intelligence. that was attractive to yeltsin. there are many people that had those active boots, what yeltsin felt, he needed somebody who had come into power and not prosecute his family. yeltsin has its own issues with corruption. more to the point, his family members had been on the take. so, if they had ended up in jail, i think yeltsin would have been devastated. he chose some of that would be loyal to yeltsin as putin was. no one was prosecuted from yeltsin's family. he got that you loyalty, he also got a lot of other things in the bargain. you're right, it's a huge turning point. >> scholars disagree about the ext

, for example, the american congressman adam kinzinger promised putin to use the fifth article of the nato charter if, of course, putin dares to commit a man-made disaster at the zaporizhia nuclear plant on in my opinion, he is not ready for such a step, since he will gain little from this, but he can lose a lot by turning all nato members against him. the whole world he himself will shut off the oxygen he breathes to his full chest outside of russia, most likely he will want to try to control the electricity he produces from the nuclear power plant and use it for russia's needs, whether in crimea or elsewhere, because this has its own benefits and this is from what we hear about the actions of the military and nuclear specialists whom russia brought to the gas station, we understand that they are shelling, but they are deliberately striking away from the main power plant. this is quite enough for blackmail, but not for causing a disaster. i think that now it is necessary to pray that the situation does not worsen and sooner or later the ukrainian troops will have to retake it because

should bear any personal responsibility for this, because if now a person who loved lukashenka or putin all her life and now the house is ransacked and she is with her children or grandchildren, it doesn't matter, she is forced to save her life. should we remember what this woman had a person's political views are not, of course, but her ukrainian passport creates her opportunity for salvation, true. and a russian passport of a person who fought against the regime or did not accept the regime, let her be three times less than her own country, we are also not often here in most of ukraine, or a belarusian passport in people who came to the square several times only fought against lukashenka's regime creates, on the contrary, a situation of political discrimination . this is wrong. i don't think that russians should come here during the war because, as you understand, that they are citizens of the country that attacked us. but i am sure that the civilized world should provide all opportunities for citizens of the russian federation of the republic of belarus, who are opponents of the puti

so let's go back to putin.ou can scare him politically not by killing his generals , soldiers or destroying equipment, he doesn't care, he's worried about his diplomatic level and it doesn't matter the west and even ukraine are not cruel enough with the dictator putin is used to blackmailing people if you do not obey me i will terrorize you kill you like rape and this blackmail unfortunately it works the same thing he is doing with the european union if you do not stop supplying arms to the ukrainians i will stop supplying gas so for now everyone to they treat him even a little gently or cautiously, nothing will change, but to weaken his political positions, it is necessary to kill his army. listen, putin, you are losing your people, that's why you have to make concessions and the conditions of the ukrainians why do i support those countries that recognized russia as a terrorist country, because it is, russia has been spreading terrorism not only in ukraine since 2014 , but also in other countries of the world,

and putin.e crimea is ukraine. that is, there is no mainland mainland, and in russia we talk about crimea in crimea there is no panic after what happened in the past there is no week, well, panic was definitely evident in crimea itself. we saw a lot of videos. we saw those in line on the krymsky bridge and those who were gasping for breath, and those who had passed over the last 8 years, who have had nervous breakdowns, and in crimea there is a significant part of people who are waiting for the deoccupation of crimea and these events do not look at the fact that they can affect them, they are still presented as positive

for you is why putin still can’t press lukashenka.think personal relations eh if putin had the opportunity to involve eh belarus directly entered into hostilities, although de facto belarus is already participating in the war, it provides its territory with its airfields, and putin also represented the resources of russia, because he did it throughout appearances of lukashenko there is more some kind of resource for internal resistance , since he understands that the immediate entry of belarusian troops into the war will mean, in the final analysis, and for him extremely unpleasant consequences. in this sense, lukashenko has a very developed political sense and , - i'm engaged in such a political equilibrium that he successfully demonstrated well, the last question for you, mr. mykola, is whether putin now has leaders of countries that it's possible with a stretch i'm possible well directly it's obvious lukashenka yes we call it a with a stretch and call it allies. i think that there are no eh in russia there are no allies russia has

he is devoted to putin like a dog.fortable partner for its neighbors. and this is medvedev of the 2022 model. a few days before the russian invasion, he, among other members of the russian security council, calls on putin to recognize the quasi-republic of the people's republic of china, recalling the war with georgia in approximately the same vein, the events developed in the 8-9th year themselves came and themselves proposed to restore relations in all directions, because let's say directly russia for the world community, for our friendly states of america in the european union, it means an order of magnitude more than ukraine, and this is understood by everyone, including ukrainians, for 8 years, russia actively distributed passports in crimea and the occupied donbas, and precisely by protecting their citizens, putin and medvedev justified the invasion of ukraine, our people are not only russian-speaking people, but it is obvious to everyone that, for example, the creation of all sorts of different problems around a

we learned that putin wants to live. yes, he hates ukraine no less than his soul, but he is not ready to sacrifice 10 minutes of his own life for the sake of this idea, and this is very good news. he wants to live, and he must be supported in this endeavor . that the only opportunity for him to be squeezed is to leave russia, to leave politics, vasya will still come and take this, as well as him who is in the bunker, it is not the rustlers who will be forced to reckon with reality and agree to the demand with the collective demand of the west, including in ukraine immediately from the troops on the line on february 23, and then negotiations on the full restoration of the territory, well, if you are ready for this, you need to add a new one. arguments will destroy the crimean bridge. yes, our armed forces, i think, are ready to implement such a scenario, but going back to history with daria dugin, we understand that idugin is not a person who could influence this collective gestapo. i do not i know who putin is, dugin, bu

putin is absolutely ready for victory. all the conditions of these negotiations, e.e., the russian status of crimea, the independence of the dpr, the lpr and other occupied territories, e.e., demilitarization denazification, neutral status, nuclear-free zone, what else, neutral status, nuclear-free zone, termination of all relations with the united states, refusal of any military exercises, well, that is, i can list it for a long time, it does not matter because even if you imagine that we went to such the negotiations have agreed to all this, i am convinced that they will return in 12 months . well, i still like the position of the president's office, who noted that ukraine's negotiating position in the conversation with russia should include four the components are long-range artillery of the russian federation atakams air defense and about shock drones and armored vehicles for counterattacks is beautiful excellent answer i think that europe will have a hard winter because in principle putin really did not expect this qu

i am talking about those who should have predicted putin's intentions. so tell me who is 100% right. who predicted the date and who predicted the direction of the invasion? to what extent do we have our strategy now, how far did we when this information appeared about a probable full-scale invasion of russia into ukraine, precisely from the us side, you accepted this information with one hundred percent confidence that it would happen, but my the bet was on autumn, i said it publicly, i said this year, this year that in fact a full-scale attack will take place in the fall, i said it publicly, i said it at various discussions, i said that autumn is due to the fact that the 24th year of putin's formal reboot is approaching, when will the presidential elections be held? well, don't forget 100 years of the soviet union, it 's three letters for us, i'm sorry, but for them, this is very important to the heads, and on december 30, they would very much like to create some kind of reincarnation of the soviet union. i think that putin decided that it is better to

this is an fsb operation, and they knew that putin putin wants to live yes, he hates ukraine no less than his soul, but he is not ready to sacrifice not his dachas, not his own life for the sake of this idea, and this is very good news. he wants to live, and it is necessary to support him in this endeavor . class politicians will come with the same scumbags as he who is in the bunker, these are not rusty people, you will have to deal with reality and agree to the demand with the collective demand of the west, including ukraine , immediately from the troops on the line on february 23 and then there are already negotiations on the full restoration of theatricality, well, if you are ready for this, you need to add new arguments, well , the krymsky bridge is still alive, and kherson is free, and i think this is a real task for the harvesting forces of ukraine in the next two months, so our armed forces scenario, but returning to the story with daria dugin, we understand the question. well, idugin is not the kind of person who could influence the father of the collective gestapo . well, s

well, listen to putin.nk it will be some kind of institute named after putin, where putinism will be studied . yes, although it is psychology, military affairs, ideology , duginism, that is, it is crystallized. conditionally speaking, what they wanted all along can be somewhere in the time of dzerzhinsky, or in the time of yezhov, it can be to embrace full power over russia for 15 years for the fact that you call a spade a spade, you don't even remember in the way you treat it, you are just such a war that a war is a war you have to sit for 15 years because you have to talk about the world the way we like it if we call war peace peace war good evil evil good please we are better than you we know everything yes, well, we won't do anything about it until they don't do it themselves , the editor-in-chief of the medical university, my technical question is for mr. oleg, look, good health. thank you for being with us on friday evening, when it comes to what is happening in russia and i am, well, i believe in thi

so, if putin will lose crimea, russia will lose putin and all these people who are now on russian television telling you that you must love the president will tell you such things about putin, they will show you photos of their children who hated putin all their lives and died for unknown reasons, they will talk about their social distrust and there won't be a single person in russia who despised putin. dmitri medvedev will tell with tears in his eyes on tv that putin beat him in his own office, but he wanted russia's freedom so much that he endured it even now endured everything and all of them and none of them will say that they threw him out because he lost in the crimea. there is no other reason for putin, he is in a difficult situation from the point of view of obtaining his power. he has to wage a war, but he cannot immediately to afford luxury is not just to lose it like that. what the russians will put it, he could say that we have achieved our goals if we are conditional conditional, so let's say we captured the entire donetsk and luhansk regions, now there is an independent state,

, but are there negotiations with putin?ns and whether this is erdoğan's peacekeeping mission. hmm, well, in general, it can be carried out. in your opinion, there are no negotiations . my post is that negotiations are a process during which some let 's say as well as a question that cannot be resolved otherwise during the course of the negotiations. currently, there are no negotiations between moscow and kyiv in principle. and everyone understands this, but you understand. what exactly is the meaning of negotiations for you, it is when the parties know what they are negotiating about, that is, if there is a platform for victory, relatively speaking, if president putin speaks, i want you to know the russian crimea and the independence of the dpr of the lpr. in return, i guarantee non-interference in your internal affairs. ukraine can make any choice to sign an agreement with the united states there on strategic partnership, join the european union or nato what do you want to do? i am interested in these territories. this is

and sometimes putin's personal friends and allies.y of them are close to the kremlin, because without the trust and confidentiality of vladimir putin, they wouldn't have made such a fortune. and if you made money, you definitely wouldn't keep it. but we gave them the green light through special visas services for the purchase of houses and large estates , we offered them very original solutions to tax issues and also provided them with lawyers. that is why great britain is often called the city of london and that's all. because we were so eager for the russian money stolen from the russian people. how did this money get into specific pockets, i think that today we regret it, because a good dozen of such persons , holders of our golden visas, are currently included in the sanctions list, and believe that this is our behavior immoral. i know that many people in ukraine are very grateful to boris johnson, but his government is involved in all this. i hope that in the near future there will be significant changes in great britain regardin

i'm not talking between the presidents anymore, because we know the position of putin and the kremlinat first we need to work out some kind of negotiating base, and then the president's documents just come and visas are issued. well, i think that no dialogue will be resumed anymore than that. i believe that with putin under no conditions , with er and whether the court er will not be given at all and what without er, no one will talk seriously anymore, because it seems to me more and more. no with he is not with his closest entourage, so i think that , by the way, the principles seem to me that today this is also the position of the ukrainian authorities because well, when it is said that russia should withdraw its troops to de-occupy ukrainian territories, then you can sit down at the table. i think that russia is clear now this without armed pressure, without the fact that ukraine will press and it will hurt very much, they will not do that. therefore, this is also one of those conditions, therefore, i think that dialogue is simply impossible today, no matter how much the kremlin wa

it was putin's victory. he understood it absolutely clearly that nato and the collective event in general allowed him to do whatever he wanted. he immediately attacked georgia. we know that in april there was already a war between russia and georgia in august. in what event did he once again show himself to be absolutely not in a strong position . let's say so, let's remember that in 2010 there was already a so-called reset of relations between russia and the united states and a warming of relations between russia and western europe began, and then just a river of military technology flowed to russia, huge contracts were just signed, let’s remember the mistrals that france almost didn’t deliver to russia, this absolutely offensive weapon, ah, these ships of power projection. that is, this is, in fact, based on this theory, or what putin wants to show nato putin has already defeated nato in his parallel world a long time ago. he believes that nato is incapable of anything, and i am sure that on february 24 he

chancellor of germany olafsholz assured russian president putin that ukraine will not join nato in theext 30 years. about this scholtz himself said in response to the question why nato allegedly did not take into account russia's interests in security matters with russia's invasion of ukraine, scholtz added that nato was never a threat to russia, and putin decided to attack because of the absurd ideas that ukraine and belarus should not be separate states, let me remind you that before the full-scale invasion of ukraine, russia held several rounds of negotiations with nato, the eu, and the united states to force the west to legally guarantee that nato would not expand or indeed that nato would expand putin is worried about this, let's talk about it further with taras zoftenko, an expert on national security issues, candidate of political sciences good evening good evening russian president vladimir putin called the reason for the invasion of ukraine the prevention of ukraine's membership in nato, but it turns out that on the eve of the invasion, german chancellor olafsholtz assured put

since we are already talking about putin, it is almost close with putin, and then we will move on toin your opinion, sisypin. he was satisfied with the status of the second pole in the bipolar world, which is looming with the superpower united states and, well, china on the other side, because in fact russia is losing its status every day there actually already lost it, is it possible to escalate that taiwan, because i understand that after all, sisipnia is satisfied to be on another policy and continue to trade and make certain statements about another participation there, you pay the price, everyone else is like that well, how was it during of the cold war, but not without coming to a direct confrontation, mr. oleksandr. well, it seems to me that we should start with such a dramatic withdrawal of the united states from afghanistan that was read in beijing and in moscow as a confirmation of their theory about the decline of u.s. instincts and that's exactly why everyone has become more active in the south china sea in the direction of taiwan, and the russian federation is in our dir

putin because if 90% had come and called against putin, then he wouldn’t be, well, it would be 100 timestherefore, if you actively express your position, at least verbally fight against putin and his power, and if you find a way to brand it. we need someone, somewhere , that we know this person. yes, but the diplomats in estonia, america, england, europe everywhere should know, well, relatively speaking, navalny doesn't raise questions, that's how he fought putin. well, he raises questions

be like without putin, at the same time we see how putin's former associates in one way or another getme unpleasant situations here and anatoly chuba was admitted to intensive care with a rare disease, as the propagandist russian mass media write. he was admitted to one of the european clinics with a diagnosis of guillain -barre syndrome, ksenia sobchak informed about it, and they say that this condition is quite difficult chubai is in a state of moderate severity, but we know that in fact at the end of march, anatoly chubais resigned from the post of a special representative of the president of russia in relations with international organizations, and he left the russian federation in general, and it is clear that putin's reaction to this démarche by chubais is what a western the media explained this smokescreen by the fact that he does not agree with the war in ukraine, and we see that, in principle, for a person like putin, it is not a problem to destroy or poison there or, let's say, take life, not only there, he destroys former associates by hundreds of thousands and tens of thous

i know, i voted, i didn’t vote for putin there, uh, i dated, i didn’t marry putin, but he lives quietlyhere and supposedly everything is fine that is, to create some uncomfortable language, of course , that it will not prevent putin from doing what i want to do, but also pretend that everything is fine, that you can live as you lived before, that this is a war . staying there for six months and that will be the end of it, no, of course, the russian people should all feel their responsibility for what is being done in ukraine in independence, he is for, against, and so on, you understand when the german dissidents or resistance fighters were developing some plans for the destruction of hitler and so on and they were attacked by british or american aircraft, they died there, for example , yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, responsibility is certain, yes, in general, what can’t be done. doesn't like putin very much and this guy can't stand putin at all, especially again, we're talking about a very ruddy-eyed crown who stole a toilet in buchi, somehow it's hard for me to imagine him go

the corpse of putin is clearly floating.ould like to ask you something about history with a calm daria dugina, it is really such an extremely difficult moment, we understand that they wanted to create or tried to create the figure of horstavel from it, but if we directly wanted to influence either putin or the russian society well, we could stop at some much more pumped-up figures, we understand . yes, there is a whole regiment of propagandists, but no , in principle, they chose a rather marginal person . and what happened here is very difficult to say, maybe it was the second signal. well, maybe it was an attempt on dugen it is possible that this story was really dragged out, so to speak, by some pavlik morozov, i don’t know , in order to make her a symbolic figure and really push her to commit some commercial war crimes against ukraine, even though they without that, so much has been committed that it is easy to list well, first of all, when we analyze any terrorist attack on the territory of modern russia, we must always